In a reel that’s gaining traction among physicians and trainees alike, two doctors (Drs. Paarth Dodia and Jarett Casale) sit casually, facing each other and chit-chatting over a cup of coffee, yet their conversation cuts to the core of a growing crisis in American medical education. They aren’t venting about patient load or night shifts. They’re talking about something deeper.. a training system they say is rigged for hospital profit, not physician growth.
View this post on Instagram
One of them, already a trained pediatrician, is facing the requirement of two additional years of fellowship just to work as a pediatric hospitalist, a role they are clinically prepared for, both in terms of training and experience. The second doctor, planning to stay on as a chief resident in internal medicine, is asked bluntly by the first: “Don’t you think the hospital should be paying you as a full-fledged hospitalist?”
The tone is casual, but the message is sharp: many physicians are beginning to view fellowship inflation as less about advancing education, and more about extending cheap labor pipelines for hospitals and training institutions.
And they’re not wrong to ask the question.
Becoming a physician in the United States already requires more than a decade of post-secondary education – four years of college, four years of medical school, and three to seven years of residency, depending on specialty. Yet for some, that still isn’t enough. In fields like pediatrics and internal medicine, fellowship requirements are increasingly tacked on. And it’s not because of clinical gaps, but, as these doctors argue, because of economic incentives tied to graduate medical education (GME) funding and staffing needs.
He wrote The House of God. Now he’s back in conversation, taking on healthcare with the same sharp eye, wit, and candor, exclusively on SoMeDocs. Watch Season II here.
Hospitals benefit handsomely from GME programs. Through Medicare and Medicaid, institutions receive billions annually to support resident and fellow training. But that money doesn’t necessarily reflect in the pay or autonomy granted to those doing the work. Residents and fellows often function as primary caregivers in major hospitals, taking on intense clinical loads at a fraction of the salary a fully licensed attending physician would earn. In many cases, the only difference between a senior resident and a junior attending is a title, rather than skillset or capability.
This imbalance has led many doctors to question: when does “training” stop being about education and start looking like exploitation?
The sentiment is growing. Doctors are speaking out more freely on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and X, where they share the day-to-day realities of their work: the long hours, the mounting debt, and now, the frustration of watching their path to professional independence be arbitrarily extended.
What’s particularly galling for many is the juxtaposition with how non-physician providers are treated. As these doctors point out in the reel, nurse practitioners (NPs) are often hired directly out of school and granted independent practice privileges in many states, without the requirement of a residency, let alone a fellowship. This isn’t a critique of NPs themselves, but rather a spotlight on the glaring double standard: why must physicians spend over a decade preparing for independent practice while others are ushered in with less oversight, fewer requirements, and, in some cases, greater autonomy?
It’s a question that goes beyond professional pride. It’s about equity, efficiency, and fairness in a system that often feels designed to extract as much labor from trainees as possible before finally granting them the title (and salary) they’ve long since earned.
Your next commute, walk, or charting break could come with a smarter soundtrack. Explore our directory of expert-led podcasts created by healthcare professionals with something meaningful to say.
This growing discontent is part of a broader shift in how doctors view their profession. The “calling” narrative (the idea that medicine is a sacred vocation that justifies any personal sacrifice) is being reevaluated. Younger physicians are increasingly unwilling to accept endless training, delayed earning power, and underpaid roles simply because “that’s how it’s always been.”
And they’re right to push back.
The “calling” narrative (the idea that medicine is a sacred vocation that justifies any personal sacrifice) is being reevaluated. Younger physicians are increasingly unwilling to accept endless training, delayed earning power, and underpaid roles simply because “that’s how it’s always been.”
While continuing education and specialization remain critical parts of medicine, artificially extended training, especially for roles that don’t truly require it, does not serve patients, doctors, or the healthcare system. It keeps early-career physicians in a holding pattern, delaying financial stability, family planning, and professional autonomy.
It also worsens burnout. When doctors are asked to perform like attendings but are paid and treated like students, resentment builds. And with physician burnout already at crisis levels, that’s a recipe for long-term harm. And that’s not just to the workforce, but to the very patients these systems are supposed to serve.
The American Board of Pediatrics and other specialty boards would do well to listen to this new generation of doctors. Training must be rigorous, but it must also be fair, efficient, and genuinely tied to patient outcomes, not institutional profits.
Because when doctors start referring to fellowship as “cheap labor in disguise,” the system isn’t just flawed — it’s broken.
Why must physicians spend over a decade preparing for independent practice while others are ushered in with less oversight, fewer requirements, and, in some cases, greater autonomy?
