I entered the field of mental health with the hope that I could make a meaningful difference, illuminate discrepancies in how illness is understood, and contribute to improving systemic limitations. My early work began in classrooms, private meetings, and conference halls. Along the way, I tried to keep conversations light-hearted by using analogies that featured my cats to highlight gaps in the system. To my surprise, these questions and illustrations sometimes generated discomfort, irritation, or exclusion, especially from professionals who felt that my ideas challenged established norms. When I once joked that my cats could make just as capable therapists as humans, the remark was labeled quirky, confusing, and inappropriate by some. Ironically, one of my cats (Agnes) truly does help provide emotional support in hospitals, homes, counseling centers, and classrooms.
Does one need to be an expert to provide mental health support? Of course, I do not believe that a cat can diagnose, prescribe medication, or design a thoughtful treatment plan. However, diagnosis and treatment can sometimes harm rather than help patients. Too many experts enter patient care with confidence that borders on certainty, which can unintentionally limit curiosity or nuance. History contains countless examples in which this mindset has created more suffering than healing, primarily through the pathologization of normal human experiences or behaviors.
AI is moving fast. Our course helps healthcare professionals keep up, with expert-led conversations on advocacy, automation, women leading in AI, ethics, regulation, and the questions medicine can’t afford to ignore.
The First Cat Doctor
The question of what constitutes a psychology doctor deserves care and sincerity. The American Psychological Association defines psychologists as individuals who hold doctoral degrees in psychology. In California, the Business and Professions Code 2900 states that no person may practice psychology or represent themselves as a psychologist without a license. However, BPC 2903 defines the practice of psychology broadly as any service involving psychological techniques used to influence behavior. This raises an interesting thought experiment: can pets influence human emotions, behavior, or psychological states? Of course. Therefore, if qualified under specific exceptions of the law mentioned in BPC 2900, could they too be considered as psychology doctors? This thought experiment is meant purely as philosophical play, not as a literal legal or clinical argument.
In 2024, I spoke to a group of clinicians about research supporting the value of animals in medical and mental health settings and playfully proposed that my cat Agnes be nominated for an honorary academic degree. I argued that it would honor her contributions in hospitals, clinics, and university settings. The idea was meant to spark conversation, not to suggest a real credentialing pathway. The reaction to the proposal varied, and it prompted lively discussion about professional identity, training, and what counts as meaningful support.
Some of the best healthcare voices are hiding in plain sight. Our speaker directory helps you find them, follow them, and invite them into the conversations that need them.
A Brief History of Cats in Science and Mental Health
Despite resistance to feline participation in human institutions, history shows how cats have meaningfully contributed to academic and professional life. Here are just a few examples. In 2024, a cat named Max was awarded a Doctorate of Litter-ature from Vermont State University. From 1997 to 2007, a cat named Stubbs served as the honorary mayor of Talkeetna, Alaska. From 1968 to 1982, a cat known as Chester published academic papers under the pseudonym F. D. C. Willard.
The deeper issue here is not whether cats should replace human clinicians. It is a question of whether medicine, mental health, and academia have created environments where diverse ideas can be safely explored. These disciplines claim rigor, yet they are often at times deeply subjective and insecure. New or unconventional perspectives are thereby often met with fear rather than curiosity. Intellectual pride and insular thinking can be obstacles to patient well-being and are among the reasons some people distrust hospitals or human doctors.
Pets may not be the right healers for everyone. However, in some situations, their calm presence, emotional attunement, and lack of ego may offer something humans struggle to provide. My intention is not to diminish the work of human clinicians. Rather, it is to explore what forms of support genuinely help people feel seen and cared for. When we expand our imagination of what healing can look like, we expand access to care itself. I welcome feedback, especially from those willing to explore how humility, openness, and unconventional thinking might lead to better care for all.
Thank mew fur reading my purrspectives.
"
Despite resistance to feline participation in human institutions, history shows how cats have meaningfully contributed to academic and professional life.
article written by Anna Yu Lee, PhD, MPH, MA Share This Quote








