I don’t recall politics being as contentious and prominent as it has been during the 2024 Presidential election. Considering the sharp political divides across the U.S. and the omnipresence of social media, I suppose it is expected.
However, what I never anticipated was finding a note in a patient’s chart by a healthcare provider stating, “We again discussed … the importance of voting and the safety, security, and effectiveness of voting by mail.” It seems to me that there is already too much medical information to cover during a 10 to 15-minute primary care visit to include discussions about politics.
Nevertheless, politics – identity politics in particular – has found a medical voice, underscoring the importance of striving for a healthcare system that is inclusive, equitable, and responsive to the realities of all patients. There is a presumption that doctors should be as concerned with politics as they are with medicine.
You look like someone worth following on LinkedIn. This free 5-day resource helps you strengthen your profile, move past posting anxiety, and start connecting with the people who belong in your professional orbit.
“Identity politics” refers to political positions and perspectives that are based on the interests and viewpoints of social groups with which people identify. These groups can be defined by various characteristics such as race, gender, sexuality, religion, or other markers of identity. The core idea is that individuals from these groups advocate for policies and social changes that address their specific needs and experiences, often in response to historical and systemic inequities.
In recent years, identity politics has increasingly infiltrated the medical field. This trend can be seen in several ways. First, medical education and training programs are placing greater emphasis on cultural competence and sensitivity to diversity. This includes understanding how social determinants of health, such as race and socioeconomic status, impact patient outcomes. Curricula are increasingly addressing topics like implicit bias, health disparities, and the importance of providing equitable care to all patients.
Second, there is a growing recognition within the healthcare community of the need to address health disparities and inequities. Professional organizations and advocacy groups are pushing for policies that aim to reduce these disparities, such as expanding access to healthcare for marginalized groups and addressing social determinants of health.
In recent years, identity politics has increasingly infiltrated the medical field.
Third, physicians are becoming more aware of the importance of considering a patient’s identity in their care. This can mean being sensitive to how a patient’s background might affect their health and their interactions with the healthcare system. It also involves creating an inclusive and welcoming environment for all patients, regardless of their identity.
Fourth, there is an increasing focus on collecting and analyzing data related to health outcomes across different identity groups. This helps in identifying and addressing health disparities. Research funding and priorities are also shifting to ensure that studies include diverse populations and consider the impact of identity on health. Public health initiatives are also becoming more tailored to address the specific needs of different identity groups. This targeted approach aims to improve health outcomes by considering the unique challenges and barriers faced by these groups.
Good ideas need legs. Share this article with your audience, tag @SoMeDocs, and we’ll swoop in with a thank-you for helping our platform stay visible and alive
While the incorporation of identity politics into the medical field aims to create a more equitable healthcare system, it also brings challenges. These include navigating potential conflicts between different identity groups, balancing individual patient needs with broader social goals, and ensuring that efforts to address disparities do not inadvertently stigmatize or marginalize certain populations.
The question of whether doctors should discuss politics with their patients invites strong opinions on both the “left” and “right” sides. Liberals and conservatives essentially make the same arguments, i.e., physicians must protect patients from radical, divisive ideology, while arguing from extreme and opposite viewpoints.
Professional boundaries are a key consideration in this issue. The primary role of a physician is to provide medical care and support to their patients. Discussions should generally center around the patient’s health, treatment options, and well-being. Introducing political discussions could potentially alienate or distress patients, which might damage the trust and rapport that are essential for an effective doctor-patient relationship.
Liberals and conservatives essentially make the same arguments, i.e., physicians must protect patients from radical, divisive ideology, while arguing from extreme and opposite viewpoints.
Ethical considerations also play a significant role. Physicians should avoid causing harm, adhering to the principle of non-maleficence. Political discussions can be polarizing and may inadvertently cause emotional or psychological distress to patients. Additionally, respecting a patient’s autonomy involves acknowledging their right to their own beliefs and values, which includes political views.
The situational context may sometimes necessitate political discussions, particularly when political issues directly impact patient health, such as policies on healthcare access, reproductive rights, and gender identity. In such cases, it might be appropriate to discuss these topics in a way that is informative and relevant to the patient’s care. If a patient initiates a political discussion and it is relevant to their concerns or care, a physician could engage, but should do so carefully, ensuring the discussion remains respectful and professional.
The internet is full of health noise. SoMeDocs brings doctors and patients closer to real experts, timely education, meaningful connection, and CME-worthy learning.
3rd Annual Private Practice Course
From Idea to Published: A Free Writing Course for Physicians
Public Speaking, Communication, and Online Presenting (Ongoing)
Autonomy & Advocacy: A Medico-Legal Course for Clinicians
2nd Annual Finances, Investing & Real Estate for Healthcare Professionals
The Future of Physician Health: Leadership, Mental Health, and Career Advancement
The Modern Allergy Course
2nd Annual Non-Clinical Careers Course
Practically, physicians might find it best to maintain a neutral stance if political topics arise, focusing on how policies may affect health and well-being rather than expressing personal political opinions. If a political discussion starts to become contentious, it may be helpful to gently steer the conversation back to the patient’s health and care.
While there may be instances where discussing political matters is relevant and necessary, it should be approached with caution, always prioritizing the patient’s health, comfort, and the integrity of the doctor-patient relationship.
